July, 2005


27
Jul 05

Compassion for Iranian Gay Teens Lost to Religious Insanity

Iran state media reports say the two teenagers were child molesters but their credibility is lacking. Details at Direland and The Washington Blade. Further updated 8/05 at Xtra.ca and 8/17 at Direland.

executed gay teenagers executed gay teenagers
executed gay teenagers executed gay teenagers
executed gay teenagers executed gay teenagers
executed gay teenagers

***


21
Jul 05

A Long, Dark Era is Over (for some)

The following editorial Canada’s Enlighetened Stand on Gay Marriage is from The Globe and Mail (Canada’s national newspaper).

Rainbow MistThe [Canadian] Senate rang with cheers on Wednesday night when the
chamber gave final legislative approval to a bill making same-sex
marriage legal right across the country. The eruption was very much in
order. By becoming just the fourth nation in the world to allow
homosexuals to wed, this country has burnished its image as a decent,
tolerant nation.

The prejudice against gays and lesbians is one of the oldest there is. For millennia, they have been shunned as deviants, freaks and
outcasts. The same-sex-marriage bill signals that, officially at
least, that long, dark era of ostracism is over. Homosexuals are at
last considered full and equal members of the human family.

And family is what this law is all about. Every person, gay or
straight, at some time feels the need for lasting love and attachment. Marriage is the ideal place to find it. Though many people find happiness outside the institution, only marriage provides the safe, secure and recognized foundation for lasting union. When they wed, people say to each other: I will be there for you, come what may, forever. At the same time, family, friends and society at large say: We are with you. By making a public, legal commitment of their devotion, couples gain the chance to deepen their connection and form a partnership that lasts. By recognizing that commitment, society helps make it last. These are the ties that bind.

To deny homosexuals the blessing of marriage was not only cruel but
stupid. Cruel, because it marked them as lesser beings, unlikely to
form lasting bonds of affection and unworthy of society’s approbation. Gays and lesbians grew up knowing that, however deep their love for another, they would never be married. Stupid, because it reinforced the very traits that many in straight society found disturbing: promiscuity, flamboyance, irresponsibility. As long as society treated them as queer, many homosexuals threw the taunt back by embracing the party lifestyle, forming a rich underworld where they could feel accepted and safe. Now, at last, they can feel that way in the light of day.

Many will choose to stay in the underworld and never marry. That is
their right. But by opening the door to its central institution,
society is signalling that there is a secure place for them in the
wider world. That is good for homosexual society, which can grow
beyond its stage of adolescent rebellion. It is also good for society
at large, which has a strong interest in lasting unions and
responsible sexual conduct.

Of course, prejudice against gays and lesbians lives on. The approval
of same-sex marriage will not banish an age-old hatred overnight.
Married or otherwise, homosexuals will continue to struggle for
understanding and acceptance. But welcoming them into the compact of
marriage is the surest signal a society can send that it no longer
considers them beyond the pale. They are family now. Canada is one of
the first places in the world to say that. Canadians should feel
proud.


14
Jul 05

Avoiding Senseless Suffering of Decent Human Beings

When the Spanish parliament took its historic vote [on June 30th, 2005] legalizing both Gay marriage and adoption of children by Gay couples, Socialist Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero – who put the full prestige of his office and party behind passage of the Gay human rights legislation – made a remarkable speech in favor of full equality for those with same-sex hearts in which he quoted two of the most illustrious Gay poets in history. Here are excerpts:

We are not legislating, honorable members, for people far away and not known by us. We are enlarging the opportunity for happiness to our neighbors, our co-workers, our friends and, our families: at the same time we are making a more decent society, because a decent society is one that does not humiliate its members. In the poem The Family, our [gay] poet Luis Cernuda was sorry because: How does man live in denial in vain by giving rules that prohibit and condemn?

Today, the Spanish society answers to a group of people who, during many years, have been humiliated, whose rights have been ignored, whose dignity has been offended, their identity denied, and their liberty oppressed. Today the Spanish society grants them the respect they deserve, recognizes their rights, restores their dignity, affirms their identity, and restores their liberty.

Joyful TearsIt is true that they are only a minority, but their triumph is everyone’s triumph. It is also the triumph of those who oppose this law, even though they do not know this yet: because it is the triumph of Liberty. Their victory makes all of us (even those who oppose the law) better people, it makes our society better.

Honorable members, there is no damage to marriage or to the concept of family in allowing two people of the same sex to get married. To the contrary, what happens is this class of Spanish citizens get the potential to organize their lives with the rights and privileges of marriage and family.

There is no danger to the institution of marriage, but precisely the opposite: this law enhances and respects marriage. Today, conscious that some people and institutions are in a profound disagreement with this change in our civil law, I wish to express that, like other reforms to the marriage code that preceded this one, this law will generate no evil, that its only consequence will be the avoiding of senseless suffering of decent human beings.

ZapateroA society that avoids senseless suffering of decent human beings is a better society. With the approval of this Bill, our country takes another step in the path of liberty and tolerance that was begun by the democratic change of government. Our children will look at us incredulously if we tell them that many years ago, our mothers had less rights than our fathers, or if we tell them that people had to stay married against their will even though they were unable to share their lives.

Today we can offer them a beautiful lesson: every right gained, each access to liberty has been the result of the struggle and sacrifice of many people that deserve our recognition and praise.

Today we demonstrate with this Bill that societies can better themselves and can cross barriers and create tolerance by putting a stop to the unhappiness and humiliation of some of our citizens.

Today, for many of our countrymen, comes the day predicted by Kavafis [the great Greek Gay poet] one century ago:

Later ’twas said of the most perfect society someone else, made like me certainly will come out and act freely.

translation by Rex Wockner


12
Jul 05

The UCC and Gay Marriage; Jesus and Adulterers

Church Clarifies Stance on Gay Marriage
By Rev. Dr. Diane Prosser

Adultery and JesusIn recent days, [...] newspapers have reported on the proceedings of the United Church of Christ General Synod in regard to a resolution that was before it. This resolution supports full legal and religious marriage equality for same-sex couples.

This was voted on by the delegates of the synod, and it passed.

As pastor of a local United Church of Christ church, I would like to clarify what this vote means for us as church members and what it does not mean.

First, the United Church of Christ is a Christian denomination firmly grounded in the teaching and example of Jesus. Included in our statement of faith is the acknowledgment of Jesus Christ as our crucified and risen savior.

As believers we are called “to accept the cost and joy of discipleship” and “to proclaim the gospel to all the world.” So no one should be confused about this.

Statements made to the press indicating that the United Church of Christ is not true to the teaching of Jesus are simply irresponsible and wrong.

Second, there are different ways to interpret Jesus’ teaching, and this takes prayerful study on the part of people in all Christian churches.

There is no record in the Bible of Jesus speaking about homosexuality. We don’t know his views on this or even if he had any views on it.

In that respect, this issue may fall in the same category as nuclear energy, global warming or women in ministry. Jesus’ teaching certainly gives guidance on these things. It helps us evaluate and decide on these matters. But they were not the major issues of Jesus’ culture and day.

Third, Jesus did teach about marriage. In the gospel of Mark, Jesus is remembered to have said that if a man “divorces his wife and marries another, he commits adultery against her.” There are no exceptions noted.

But in the gospel of Matthew, he is remembered to have said “whoever divorces his wife, except for unchastity, and marries another, commits adultery.”

So which is it? Which of these did Jesus say?

And if biblical literalists insist that he said both, then the question is, “Well, which one did he mean?” Obviously, he was talking about faithfulness in relationship.

Some Christians today say that it is a sin for a married person to divorce his or her spouse. But other Christians point out that some marriages are so abusive or dysfunctional that it is more of a sin to stay married than to divorce.

Likewise, some Christians today say that only a man and a woman can be married. Others know of faithful loving relationships between same-sex couples and ask why it wouldn’t be consistent with the teaching of Jesus to grant these relationships the sanctity of marriage.

At the very least, there should be genuine, respectful conversation on these issues among Christians, with some leeway for differences of interpretation.

Finally, in regard to the polity of the United Church of Christ, I want to emphasize that the United Church of Christ is not a hierarchy. There is no person or group at the national level who tells local churches what to believe.

Churches are encouraged to study these issues and the denomination provides excellent resources for study. But it is the local United Church of Christ church that ultimately decides which interpretation seems faithful to them and abides by that.

(The Rev. Dr. Diane Prosser is pastor of Faith United Church of Christ in State College, Pennsylvania.)