Seven LGBT Short Videos

1. Trevor Project – Stories from the Frontline
2. Gen Silent – LGBT Elders go back into the closet to survive
3. In The Life – State of the Movement
4. How to Never Be Wrong Arguing Against Homosexuality
5. Everyone Matters: Dignity and Safety for Transgender and Transsexual People
6. Why We Fight – Wallace Shawn reads Vito Russo
7. Urvashi Vaid – The Mission of the LGBT Civil Rights Movement in the 21st Century

Beliefs drive research agenda of new think tanks
Study on gay adoption disputed by specialists
By Michael Kranish of The Boston Globe
July 31, 2005

WASHINGTON — President Bush had a ready answer when asked in January for his view of adoption by same-sex couples: ”Studies have shown that the ideal is where a child is raised in a married family with a man and a woman,” the president said.

Bush’s assertion raised eyebrows among specialists. The American Academy of Pediatrics, composed of leaders in the field, had found no meaningful difference between children raised by same-sex and heterosexual couples, based on a 2002 report written largely by a Boston pediatrician, Dr. Ellen C. Perrin.

But Bush’s statement was celebrated at a tiny think tank called the Family Research Institute, where the founder, Dr. Paul Cameron, believes Bush was referring to studies he has published in academic journals that are critical of gays and lesbians as parents. Cameron has published numerous studies with titles such as ”Gay Foster Parents More Apt to Molest” — a conclusion disputed by many other researchers.

The president’s statement was also welcomed at a small organization with an august-sounding name, the American College of Pediatricians. The college, which has a small membership, says on its website that it would be ”dangerously irresponsible” to allow same-sex couples to adopt children. The college was formed just three years ago, after the 75-year-old American Academy of Pediatrics issued its paper.

That pediatric study asserted a ”considerable body of professional evidence” that there is no difference between children of same-sex and heterosexual parents.

The Family Research Institute and the American College of Pediatrics are part of a rapidly growing trend in which small think tanks, researchers, and publicists who are open about their personal beliefs are providing what they portray as medical information on some of the most controversial issues of the day.

Created as counterpoints to large, well-established medical organizations whose work is subject to rigorous review and who assert no political agenda, the tiny think tanks with names often mimicking those of established medical authorities have sought to dispute the notion of a medical consensus on social issues such as gay rights, the right to die, abortion, and birth control.

For example, Cameron’s Family Research Institute, with an annual budget of less than $200,000, tries to counter the views of the 150,000-member American Psychological Association, which has an annual budget of $98 million. The tiny American College of Pediatricians has a single employee, yet it has been quoted as a counterpoint to the 60,000-member American Academy of Pediatrics.

Senior Bush aides, asked for the basis of the comment about adoption, now say they are unaware of any studies comparing heterosexual and same-sex adoptions — by Cameron or by any pediatric association. The president, they say, was probably referring to studies that show children are better off living with both biological parents — though those studies have nothing to do with adoption by same-sex couples.

But Cameron said that he feels confident that Bush was referring to his work, and that he once briefed two White House aides on his research, which is widely distributed through the Christian Communication Network, a public relations firm run by an antiabortion activist, Gary L. McCullough, who also was the press agent for the parents of Terri Schiavo.

Indeed, a web search found that Cameron’s findings had been repeated on a variety of conservative websites and blogs.

Cameron said he has made a deliberate strategy of getting his research published in peer-reviewed academic journals, which he considers more effective than merely writing opinion articles. Cameron said the credibility that goes with being published in the journals enables him to be cited in court decisions and to promote his views in public appearances. Peer review ”is the standard in the academic world,” Cameron said. ”It means that other people have looked at what you’ve done and said, ‘It’s OK.’ “

But Cameron’s adoption study, and at least 10 more of his works, appeared in Psychological Reports, a small journal based in Montana, which says its studies are peer-reviewed, although editor Doug Ammons said: ”No reviewer has a veto right.” The journal, which typically charges $27.50 per page to print an article, is portrayed by Ammons as a ”scientific manifestation of free speech.”

By contrast, the largest professional journals, which are often cited as sources of medical information — such as Journal of the American Medical Association and the New England Journal of Medicine — say they will reject an article if any peer reviewer raises serious objections about its methodology. Those journals do not charge for publication.

Perrin, the Boston pediatrician, has watched these developments from a unique perspective. She was a lead author of the report by the American Academy of Pediatrics — unanimously approved by its board of directors and its president and vice president — that was supportive of same-sex parenting, and she has suggested repeatedly that articles by Cameron be rejected by medical journals.

She said she was startled that the American College of Pediatrics had been formed partly in response to her article, and said she is ”amazed” that Cameron continues to be published in peer-reviewed journals. Whenever she has been asked to review his work, Perrin added, she has found it obviously flawed in its methodology.

”Each time I have recommended to the editor that the manuscript not be published, because the science did not stand up to basic standards,” Perrin said.

But as recently as June, two of Cameron’s papers were published in Psychological Reports, garnering him more publicity.

Paul Cameron, 65, who received his doctorate in psychology at the University of Colorado-Boulder in 1966, received widespread notice in 1983, when he cofounded the Institute for the Scientific Investigation of Sexuality. That organization eventually turned into Cameron’s Family Research Institute. Cameron used his tiny think tank as a vehicle to publish reports saying homosexuals were more likely than heterosexuals to commit crimes and to molest children.

The American Psychological Association quickly launched an investigation into Cameron’s methodology after receiving complaints from some of its members. The association sent Cameron a letter in December 1983, saying it had decided to ”drop you from membership” because he had not cooperated with the investigation. (Asked if the association still has concerns about Cameron, a spokeswoman, Rhea Faberman, said: ”We are concerned about Dr. Cameron because we do believe that his methodology is weak.”)

In 1984, the Nebraska Psychological Association issued a statement saying it ”formally dissociates itself from the representations and interpretations of scientific literature offered by Dr. Paul Cameron.”

The American Sociological Association issued a resolution saying: ”Cameron has consistently misinterpreted and misrepresented sociological research on sexuality, homosexuality, and lesbianism.”

Despite the rebukes from professional organizations, Cameron seems to have found a ready audience for his research among those opposed to homosexuality for moral or political reasons.

In 1992, Cameron joined a fight against a proposed gay rights law in Colorado. Gale A. Norton, who was then Colorado’s attorney general and who is now the secretary of the Interior in the Bush administration, defended a voter-approved measure that prohibited extending civil rights laws to gays. Norton’s office paid Cameron $15,000 as a consultant on the case, although his testimony was never used.

The US Supreme Court threw out Colorado’s law. Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the majority that ”a state cannot so deem a class of persons a stranger to its laws.” Norton responded to the Supreme Court ruling by saying it ”mocks the Democratic process.”

In 2000, Cameron traveled to Maine to campaign against a gay-rights initiative. Most recently, Cameron’s research has shown up in many political and legal fights. It was cited by dissenters in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court case that led to legalizing same-sex marriage, and in a Florida Supreme Court decision that upheld a law banning adoption by same-sex couples.

In February, he testified in favor of a Virginia proposal to require that social workers learn the sexual orientation of adoptive parents.

Cameron’s work is controversial even among conservative groups. For example, the Traditional Values Coalition claims to speak for 43,000 churches. For three years, the coalition has quoted Cameron’s studies on its website in an article headlined, ”Report Shows Homosexual Foster Parents Apt To Molest Children,” and has told its membership to ”read and distribute Dr. Cameron’s report.”

But when The Boston Globe asked the Traditional Values Coalition last week about Cameron, the group responded within minutes by removing all references to Cameron from its website. The group’s spokeswoman, Daniella Lopez, said Cameron’s research had been ”mistakenly” put on the website. She would not say why the group thought it was a mistake to publicize Cameron’s research.

Cameron gets publicity partly by relying on the Christian Communication Network, an organization that has become a powerful tool for opponents of abortion, same-sex marriage, and stem-cell research. It is run by McCullough, the antiabortion activist, who had been the press agent for the antiabortion group Operation Rescue.

McCullough, a former watch salesman who honed his publicity skills by doing jailhouse interviews during his Operation Rescue days, was the press agent for the parents of Terri Schiavo. Schiavo had been diagnosed by court-appointed doctors as being in a persistent vegetative state; she died in March after her feeding tubes were removed.

McCullough says he persuaded the parents to release a videotape of Schiavo that, the parents said, showed Schiavo responding to them. The video became the focal point of the debate over whether Schiavo was really in a vegetative state and should be removed from life support. McCullough also published press releases purporting to cite medical expertise, such as one titled, ”Terri Schiavo’s Husband Fits Profile of Wife Abuser, Per Psychiatrist.”

Schiavo’s father, Robert Schindler, confirmed McCullough’s role, saying he was a ”valuable asset” who had also become a close friend.

As a publicity outlet for Cameron, McCullough has published press releases in the past several weeks with headlines that include these: ”Gays Twice as Apt to Drive Under the Influence, says Family Research Institute,” ”Gays 6X More Expensive Than Smokers, says Family Research Institute,” and, ”Weird Behavior Among Gays Due to Mental Illness? Asks Family Research Institute.”

McCullough said he publicizes such material not just because Cameron is a paying client, but also because he believes homosexuality ”is a destructive behavior.” He said that he had not examined the basis for Cameron’s research, but that he felt certain that if there were a problem with it, a reporter would have inquired about it.

An Internet search found that McCullough’s publicity is widely cited, especially on conservative sites and blogs. McCullough, as a representative for groups ranging from the Christian Coalition to the National Right to Life Committee, touts his publicity apparatus as a crucial part of influencing national politics and policy.

“I’m like the liver or the kidney,” McCullough said. “I’m like some internal organ that nobody sees but is a very important part of the body.”

With his research widely publicized on the Internet and talk radio, Cameron says he believes his views have reached the White House.

In January, Bush was asked about adoption by same-sex couples. Bush responded that “private adoption firms can make whatever choice they choose to do,” and that “I believe children can receive love from gay couples,” but added: “Studies have shown that the ideal is where a child is raised in a married family with a man and a woman.”

Bush’s comments were made off the cuff in an interview with The New York Times. Asked six months later to account for the remarks, Bush’s aides on parenting said they believe Bush was referring to more general studies about the benefits of children living with biological parents, even though those studies do not pass judgment on adoption by parents of the same sex.

Bush’s chief domestic adviser, Claude Allen, said: “What we don’t have is any data that have studied same-sex families.”

Nonetheless, Cameron said he believes Bush’s statement shows that the president had been influenced by his research, although Cameron said there was no way he could be sure. He said that he has talked with two White House officials about his studies, but that he could not remember their names.

Bush’s statement startled Perrin, the Boston pediatrician who wrote the report about adoption by same-sex couples for the American Academy of Pediatrics.

In that report, Perrin wrote that the Academy “recognizes that a considerable body of professional literature provides evidence that children with parents who are homosexual can have the same advantages and the same expectations for health, adjustment, and development as can children whose parents are heterosexual.”

The report was published in the Academy’s journal, Pediatrics. It is the academy’s summation of 31 studies on the topic.

While a typical paper published in a peer-reviewed journal is approved by a couple of editors and perhaps three outside reviewers, Perrin said her report underwent a more rigorous procedure, because it was approved unanimously by the academy’s 10 board members.

Dr. Joseph Hagan, a Vermont pediatrician who chaired the academy committee that oversaw the report, said that the Academy had reviewed all of the available literature. “If there are studies that show there are bad outcomes for these kids, we could not find them, and we looked, we looked really hard,” Hagan said.

But some members of the academy said they were unhappy with the report. Dr. Joseph Zanga, a former president of the Academy, voiced concern that his opposition didn’t stop the report from being published.

“Even though the paper has a disclaimer saying it is based on science, there is no science to support it,” Zanga said in an interview.

So Zanga and about a dozen colleagues formed a new organization, the American College of Pediatricians. Zanga declined to give figures for the College’s membership, but a fellow board member, Dr. Bose Ravenel, said there are between 150 and 200 members.

The College’s website said there is scientific evidence that gays and lesbians are more prone to mental illness, substance abuse, and other problems, concluding with a strong warning against same-sex parenting.

“Given the current body of research, the American College of Pediatricians believes it is inappropriate, potentially hazardous to children, and dangerously irresponsible, to change the age-old prohibition on homosexual parenting, whether by adoption, foster care, or by reproductive manipulation. This position is rooted in the best available science.”

The website does not mention Cameron as a source of the science, but Ravenel, the board member, said: “I’ve read a lot of his research. It is well done.” (Cameron said he has discussed his research with some College members.)

The College has been widely quoted in the media, sometimes without an explanation, as saying that it broke away from the Academy, largely over the issue of same-sex parenting.

Perrin voiced a concern that the public may be confused about which organization has long represented pediatricians.

While Perrin has been startled by the College’s effort to counter the Academy, she has been dismayed by Cameron’s work having been published in peer-reviewed journals. She said that she had been asked to serve as a peer reviewer for at least three of Cameron’s articles submitted to medical journals.

“I’m amazed that he is able to continue to be published,” said Perrin, a professor of pediatrics at the Floating Hospital for Children, Tufts-New England Medical Center. Perrin emphasized that her concern is not just about Cameron, but also about the way his research is quoted by others to justify restrictions on adoption by same-sex couples.

Gregory M. Herek, professor of psychology at the University of California at Davis, who has followed Cameron’s career, said: ”Most members of the public assume that a paper published in an academic journal is a legitimate scientific study. They don’t understand that journals vary widely in their quality and in the rigor of their review process. Cameron’s work is methodologically weak and in many cases the conclusions he draws from his data are not valid.”

Most recently, Cameron has said that “the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has suppressed a new study that concludes homosexuals are involved in criminality more than their heterosexual counterparts.”

But Karen Hunter, a spokeswoman for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said the government agency has “never conducted a study of criminal activity among homosexuals versus heterosexuals. If we have never done a study, we would not be able to suppress it.”

Cameron responded that his data came from a government drug-abuse survey, but the agency that collected the data said it could not replicate Cameron’s findings.

Cameron’s publisher, Psychological Reports, said it does not reject an article on grounds that it has received a negative review from peers, although it often asks for revisions.

As Ammons, the editor, put it, “No opinion of a reviewer will ever veto, by itself, an article . . . We just simply invite them to comment. If they disagree with some aspect, they are free to submit a comment.”

“People want to anoint something published in a scientific journal as ‘The Truth.’ It isn’t and it can’t be,” Ammons said. He added that his publication does not have a political agenda, and he said he personally disagrees with much of what Cameron has written but believes he should be published.

In several interviews and e-mail exchanges, Cameron made no effort to hide his view of gays and lesbians.

He said his research is meant to warn that gays and lesbians and those sympathetic to them are people he calls “death marketers.” “I am not sure how long they will take to destroy the US from within, but sufficiently weakened, the US will probably fall to another state before that occurs,” Cameron wrote via e-mail.

“Those of us at FRI are determined to do our best to oppose these death activists. As you see, the Internet has given us far more clout than our limited budget and efforts could otherwise hope for.”

###

Southern Poverty Law Center
Intelligence Report
Spring 2005, Issue 117
‘A Mighty Army‘
A dozen major groups help drive the religious right’s anti-gay crusade

Inspired by the organizing successes of early anti-gay crusaders like Anita Bryant, Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, fundamentalist political activists have turned the anti-gay movement into a virtual industry over the last three decades.

Below are profiles of a dozen of today’s most influential anti-gay groups. Groups designated as hate groups by the Southern Poverty Law Center are marked with an asterisk.

Alliance Defense Fund
American Family Association
American Vision*
Chalcedon Foundation*
Christian Action Network
Concerned Women for America
Coral Ridge Ministries/Center for Reclaiming America
Family Research Council
Family Research Institute*
Focus on the Family
Summit Ministries
Traditional Values Coalition

Alliance Defense Fund
SCOTTSDALE, Ariz.
www.alliancedefensefund.org

In 1993, with gay-rights issues increasingly being contested in the courts, a coalition of 35 Christian Right groups founded the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF). Key founders included D. James Kennedy of Coral Ridge Ministries, Donald Wildmon of the American Family Association, and James Dobson of Focus on the Family.

ADF President Alan Sears was a culture-war veteran, having served as executive director of Attorney General Edwin Meese’s Commission on Pornography during the Reagan Administration.

Sears believed the fundamentalist right needed to get serious after years of liberal court victories: “They hit and they hit and they hit, and finally we’re defending.” Sears claims that the ultimate goal of the gay-rights movement is to “silence” Christians.

In 1994, ADF solicited funds on Christian radio with an ad claiming, “Pro-life demonstrations may soon be illegal. … Religious broadcasting may soon be censored. Hiring homosexuals in Christian schools, churches, and even as Sunday School teachers may soon become the law of the land. … Don’t let Christianity become a crime.”

In 2003, Sears and ADF Vice President Craig Osten expanded on that theme in The Homosexual Agenda: Exposing the Principal Threat to Religious Freedom, which ties homosexuality to pedophilia and other “disordered sexual behavior.”

In 2000, the ADF helped defend the Boy Scouts of America’s ban on openly gay scoutmasters, which was upheld by a narrow 5-4 majority of the U.S. Supreme Court. The ADF has also mounted legal challenges to gay military service, marriage, adoption and foster-parenting, as well as to domestic partner benefits around the nation.

It trains other attorneys “to battle the radical homosexual legal agenda” in free, week-long National Litigation Academies, whose participants commit to “provide 450 hours of pro bono legal work on behalf of the Body of Christ.”

American Family Association
TUPELO, Miss.
www.afa.net

Best known for leading boycotts of advertisers who support “indecency” in the mass media (including the supposedly cocaine-snorting Mighty Mouse), the Rev. Donald Wildmon, a former Methodist minister, has led a series of religious-right groups since 1976.

Appointed by Alan Sears (see Alliance Defense Fund) to the Meese Commission on Pornography in 1985, Wildmon successfully urged the removal of Playboy and Penthouse from some 17,000 convenience stores. But another favorite target has been homosexuality.

In the 1980s, Wildmon succeeded in getting ads pulled from shows like “Thirtysomething,” added to Wildmon’s list of “Trash TV” because its plot included a gay romance. The American Family Association (AFA), created by Wildmon in 1977 as the National Federation for Decency but renamed AFA in 1988, has built an empire — a 200-station radio network, about 100 employees and a monthly AFA Journal sent to 180,000 people — largely on the basis of anti-gay appeals.

In one October 2004 article, the AFA Journal suggests that gay influences are leading to a “grotesque culture” that will include “quick encounters in the middle school boys’ restroom.” In its 1994 booklet Homosexuality in America, the AFA claims “[p]rominent homosexual leaders and publications have voiced support for pedophilia, incest, sadomasochism, and even bestiality.”

AFA’s direct-mail appeals are particularly shrill. “For the sake of our children and society, we must OPPOSE the spread of homosexual activity! Just as we must oppose murder, stealing, and adultery!” says one such recent fundraising letter. “Since homosexuals cannot reproduce, the only way for them to ‘breed’ is to RECRUIT! And who are their targets for recruitment? Children!”

AFA has 21 state directors, including California’s Scott Lively, co-author of The Pink Swastika, a book that claims “homosexuals are the true inventors of Nazism and the guiding force behind many Nazi atrocities” (see also Making Myths).

In late 2004, the AFA called for a boycott of Proctor & Gamble, calling it “one of the largest promoters of the homosexual agenda,” partly because it advertises on TV shows “Will and Grace” and “Queer Eye for the Straight Guy.” By late January 2005, AFA claimed more than 380,000 people had signed its boycott petition.

With Wildmon reportedly in shaky health, his son, Tim, now serves as AFA president.

American Vision*
ATLANTA, Ga.
www.americanvision.org

Founded in 1978 by Gary DeMar, one of America’s most prominent proponents of Christian Reconstructionism, American Vision produces a wide variety of “educational resources” designed to “restore America’s Biblical foundation.” Like R.J. Rushdoony, the founder of Reconstructionism (see Chalcedon Foundation), DeMar contends that the U.S. was founded as a “Christian nation” and that its democracy should be replaced by a theocratic government run by Christians who will strictly impose certain Old Testament prohibitions, including passages they interpret as opposing homosexuality and abortion.

“The Bible is clear on moral issues that are culture-killers: homosexuality, homosexual marriage, and abortion,” says DeMar, who is closely allied with D. James Kennedy of Coral Ridge Ministries, where he frequently speaks.

While DeMar insists that homosexuals wouldn’t be rounded up and systematically executed under a “reconstructed” government, he does believe that the occasional execution of “sodomites” would serve society well, because “the law that requires the death penalty for homosexual acts effectively drives the perversion of homosexuality underground, back into the closet.”

Another “long-term goal,” he writes elsewhere, should be “the execution of abortionists and parents who hire them.”

DeMar is also down on anti-poverty programs. “Nowhere in the Bible is civil government given authority to help the poor by raising taxes on the rich,” he insists in the American Vision Web site essay. “In fact, as history shows, the ‘war on poverty’ became the war on the poor.”

DeMar is tightly linked to other Reconstructionists, including Gary North, with whom he co-authored Christian Reconstruction: What It Is, What It Isn’t.

In 1993, American Vision helped county commissioners in Cobb County, Ga., pass an anti-gay resolution so strongly worded that it sparked a national controversy. Cobb County Commissioner Gordon Wysong spoke at American Vision’s annual fundraising banquet the following year, saying of gay people, “We should blame them for every social failure in America.”

Chalcedon Foundation*
VALLECITO, Calif.
www.chalcedon.edu

The late Rousas John Rushdoony, known as the “father of Christian Reconstructionism,” established the Chalcedon Foundation in 1965. The think tank’s name refers to the Council of Chalcedon, which in 451 A.D. proclaimed the state’s subservience to God.

Rushdoony’s message, articulated in his massive 1973 opus, The Institutes of Biblical Law, is similar: fundamentalist Christians must take control of governments and impose strict biblical law on America and the world. That would mean the death penalty for “practicing homosexuals,” among many other “abominators.”

Rushdoony, whose book is revered by Reconstructionists as their foundational document, was also a racist. He opposed “unequal yoking” — interracial marriage or even “enforced integration” — insisting in the book that “[a]ll men are NOT created equal before God… . Moreover, an employer has a property right to prefer whom he will in terms of ‘color,’ creed, race or national origin.”

The Bible, Rushdoony wrote, “recognizes that some people are by nature slaves.” In fact, American slavery was “generally benevolent” despite misguided attempts to make whites feel guilty about it.

Rushdoony was also a Holocaust denier, attacking the “false witness” that some 6 million Jews were murdered in World War II.

In the early 1990s, Rushdoony was reportedly a member of the board of governors of the secretive Council of National Policy Board, an exclusive group of arch-conservative leaders, where he was feted on his 80th birthday by Howard Phillips (Phillips ran for president twice on the extremist Constitution Party ticket).

Although most fundamentalist leaders now deny holding Reconstructionist beliefs, several — including Beverly and Tim LaHaye (see Concerned Women for America), Donald Wildmon (see American Family Association) and D. James Kennedy (see Coral Ridge Ministries) — did serve alongside Rushdoony and other Chalcedon associates on the Coalition for Revival, a group formed in 1981 to “reclaim America.”

Christian Action Network
FOREST, Va.
www.christianaction.org

Martin Mawyer, longtime editor of Jerry Falwell’s Moral Majority Report, founded the Christian Action Network (CAN) in 1990, a year after Falwell folded the original Moral Majority.

In his “dirty and dangerous” battle against “militant homosexual groups,” Mawyer has not held back. In 1997, after Ellen Degeneres came out as a lesbian on her TV sitcom, Mawyer accused her of “DUMPING HER FILTHY LESBIAN LIFESTYLE RIGHT IN THE CENTER OF YOUR LIVING ROOM!! … If we allow the tidal wave of gay and lesbian smut to continue to pour into our homes, it will utterly consume us in no time at all!”

In 1999, he asked the Federal Communications Commission to put an “HC [homosexual conduct] warning label” on TV programs with gay characters. The following year, CAN caused a national stir when TV stations refused to air its inflammatory ad attacking Hillary Clinton, who was then running for U.S. Senate.

Over ominous drumbeats, the narrator intoned: “It is rumored that Hillary Clinton is a lesbian. It is rumored that Hillary Clinton supported homosexual marriage. It is rumored that Hillary Clinton will leave her husband upon taking office. … Sometimes, rumors are true. Shouldn’t you know the truth? For more information on traditional family values, please contact the Christian Action Network.”

More recently, CAN protested “Gay Days” at Disney World and other theme parks — events that Mawyer’s wife and CAN partner, Bonnie, says demonstrate “the true intent of these homosexuals: they are after our children!!”

A 2000 Mawyer mailing incorporated militia-like paranoia: “I am not ready to give this great nation over to one-world government extremists … radical, disease-carrying homosexuals … anti-family lesbian feminists … or anti-American U.N. globalists!”

CAN activists today are familiar faces at Gay Days, videotaping “bad behavior.” In 2003, CAN turned its footage of “homosexual kissing, hugging and fondling” into a video tour of the Southeast, warning parents about the perils of Gay Days and warning that “homosexuals live in a pattern of sin and debauchery.”

Concerned Women for America
WASHINGTON, D.C.
www.cfwa.org

When she founded Concerned Women for America (CWA) in 1979, Beverly LaHaye was a budding “family activist” best known for The Act of Marriage, a fiery anti-feminist bestseller co-authored with her husband, Tim.

LaHaye’s goal was to energize the anti-feminist (or “pro-family”) cause with an advocacy group that might rival the National Organization for Women — which LaHaye calls “anti-God, anti-family” — in both size and political power. With a daily radio show that now reaches more than 1 million listeners, four affiliate organizations, and a cadre of attorneys, researchers and lobbyists battling the “radical, leftist crusade to transform America into Sextopia,” LaHaye has done just that.

She pins much of the blame for the “radical crusade” on gay people. In 1992, LaHaye said gay activists “go after boys by becoming teachers and Boy Scout leaders.” In 1998, CWA called homosexuals “people who make lewd phone calls, expose themselves to others, and engage in prostitution.”

n 2001, LaHaye hired two of America’s most prominent anti-gay propagandists, Robert Knight and Peter LaBarbera, to launch CWA’s Culture and Family Institute. LaBarbera, a former Washington Times reporter and editor of an inflammatory anti-gay journal called The Lambda Report on Homosexual Activism, had earlier been thrown out of the American Psychological Association due to his faulty “science.” That didn’t prevent him from producing CWA’s 11 Ways You Can Fight the Homosexual Agenda manual.

Knight, called “America’s premier gay-basher” by Rob Boston of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, produces reams of sensationalistic reports like “Sexual Orientation and American Culture,” which warns that accepting “sexual orientation as a civil right” will lead to “a loss of stability in communities, with a rise in crime, sexually transmitted diseases and other social pathologies.”

Knight has also accused gays of preying on “shy and artistic young boys,” using the boys’ desire for male affirmation to make them into “an easy mark for seduction.”

After the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, CWA accused same-sex partners of those killed of “trying to hijack the moral capital of marriage.” Last year, CWA raised a ruckus over a gay Canadian couple that wanted to visit the U.S. together, calling the men “a new threat to border security” and “the latest pair of ‘domestic terrorists.’”

The group has also accused the Harry Potter books of promoting the practice of witchcraft among children.

Coral Ridge Ministries/
Center for Reclaiming America
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla.
www.coralridge.org

Beginning in the early 1960s, the Rev. D. James Kennedy turned conservative Coral Ridge Presbyterian into a mega-church that now claims 10,000 members. In 1974, Kennedy branched out with Coral Ridge Ministries, which has since become one of the largest fundamentalist enterprises in America with some 160 employees, several divisions including a Washington-based Center for Christian Statesmanship, and radio and television studios producing shows that reach a combined weekly audience of 3 million.

In his book Stranger at the Gate, evangelical minister Mel White (see A Thorn in Their Side), who produced a popular film for Kennedy called “Like a Mighty Army,” says Coral Ridge “practically funded its television outreach on … disgusting, inflammatory antigay propaganda.”

In one typical newsletter, Kennedy published a photograph of two sweet-looking children under a headline reading, “Sex with Children? Homosexuals Say Yes!” Elsewhere, he has written that “homosexuals prey on adolescent boys” and “take America’s children.”

After Kennedy cited bogus claims about AIDS transmission, U.S. Surgeon General C. Everett Koop, himself a conservative evangelical, attacked his statement as “reprehensible” and “homophobic.” “I just cannot believe the poor scholarship of so many Christians,” Koop said, adding that Kennedy refused his subsequent offer of a briefing on the facts of AIDS transmission.

Kennedy denies that he subscribes to the extremist ideology of Christian Reconstructionism, which calls for killing “practicing homosexuals,” but he is tied closely to leading Reconstructionists.

Kennedy has described the works of Reconstructionism founder R.J. Rushdoony (see Chalcedon Foundation), which are laced with anti-black racism and anti-gay vitriol, as “essential.” His ministry has sold a book by leading Reconstructionist George Grant that laments the abandonment of legal codes prescribing death for homosexuals.

And he certainly holds theocratic views closely related to Reconstructionism, as reflected in the name he chose for Coral Ridge’s political outreach arm: the Center for Reclaiming America (CRA). Since its founding in 1996, the CRA has brought together fundamentalist groups in campaigns like “Truth in Love,” a million-dollar 1998 ad campaign that promoted “ex-gay” ministries offering discredited methods of “curing” homosexuals.

CRA sponsors an annual conference, Reclaiming America for Christ, that has featured leading Reconstructionists like Grant (who is also a former Coral Ridge vice president) and Gary DeMar (see American Vision), along with anti-gay stalwarts like Robert Knight (see Concerned Women of America).

Coral Ridge also has been a generous supporter of deposed Alabama Chief Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore, the “Ten Commandments Judge” who in a 2002 “special concurrence” court opinion suggested that the state could impose “physical penalties, such as confinement and even execution” to protect children from gays and lesbians.

Moore’s new Alabama outfit, the Foundation for Moral Law, is being partly bankrolled by Coral Ridge.

Family Research Council
WASHINGTON, D.C.
www.frc.org

In 1988, James Dobson’s Focus on the Family mega-ministry merged with the Family Research Council (FRC), a tiny Washington think tank headed by Gary Bauer, a former Department of Education official. With Focus’ millions behind it, FRC’s profile shot up as Bauer brought Dobson’s anti-gay, anti-abortion and anti-sex education messages to leaders on Capitol Hill.

When FRC’s lobbying threatened Focus’ tax-exempt status in 1992, the groups severed their legal ties. But by then, FRC had become a powerful group in its own right.

During the gays-in-the-military debate of 1993, Bauer wrote an influential op-ed alleging that gay people’s “notion of ‘civil rights’ would mean a jackboot on the back of the 99 percent of society that still follows the norms of nature.”

Robert Knight, FRC’s chief anti-gay researcher during the 1990s (see also Concerned Women for America), claimed that the gay rights movement’s main goal was “going after the kids.”

Drawing liberally on the discredited research of Paul Cameron (see Family Research Institute), Knight published papers claiming, among other things, that gay people view “pedophiles as the ‘prophets’ of a new sexual order.” FRC also cited Cameron’s bogus claim that children in gay households are at greater risk of sexual involvement with a parent. In a legal brief, it even warned that schools offering diversity education could be sued for contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

The FRC led boycotts and protests when major corporations began to give domestic-partner benefits; in 1997, Knight lambasted American Airlines for its “immoral” benefits program, asking, “What are you going to develop next? A pedophilia market?”

Former Louisiana legislator Tony Perkins, a “family values” crusader who had given a speech to the white-supremacist Council of Conservative Citizens on May 19, 2001, took over the FRC’s leadership in 2003. By then, the FRC was well established in Washington, with board members like Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, an OB/GYN who in his 2004 campaign falsely claimed that guards had to be posted inside some public school restrooms to protect girls from lesbian sex attacks.

The FRC’s current senior fellow for cultural studies, Timothy Dailey, has taken over Knight’s role as FRC’s main anti-gay propagandist, comparing gays to “abnormal cells,” co-authoring Getting It Straight, a “statistical” compendium of the “evils” of homosexuality, and penning Dark Obsession: The Tragedy and Threat of the Homosexual Lifestyle, yet another lurid FRC publication.

Family Research Institute*
COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo.
www.familyresearchinst.org

Founded in 1987 by Paul Cameron, the Family Research Institute (FRI) claims to produce “cutting-edge research” on “family policy” issues. In truth, Cameron is the longtime house psychologist of the anti-gay movement — and one of the most thoroughly discredited researchers in America.

After losing his job teaching psychology at the University of Nebraska in 1980, Cameron began to crank out “scientific” studies that bolstered the claims of Anita Bryant, Jerry Falwell and other early anti-gay crusaders that gay people were “diseased perverts” with a program to molest children and demolish America.

Cameron’s first organization, the Institute for the Scientific Investigation of Sexuality, distributed hysterical pamphlets falsely alleging that gay people were much more likely than others to be serial murderers, child molesters and intentional disease-spreaders.

Years later, Cameron’s FRI Web site was still singing the same tune: “The typical sexual practices of homosexuals are a medical horror story — imagine exchanging saliva, feces, semen and/or blood with dozens of different men each year. Imagine drinking urine, ingesting feces and experiencing rectal trauma on a regular basis.”

That’s only the beginning. In a 1981 debate, Cameron claimed a 4-year-old boy had been sexually mutilated in a Lincoln, Neb., mall rest room as part of a “homosexual act” — but police in Lincoln said no such crime had occurred.

He told the 1985 Conservative Political Action Committee conference that “extermination of homosexuals” might be needed in the next three to four years. He has advocated tattooing AIDS patients in the face, and banishment to a former leper colony for any patient who resisted. He has called for gay bars to be closed and gays to be registered with the government.

Cameron even has called AIDS a “godsend,” and it was for him: Though he was kicked out of the American Psychological Association for ethical violations in 1983 (he was alleged to have used unsound methods and misrepresented the work of others) — and then, after pawning himself off as a sociologist, declared “not a sociologist” by the American Sociological Association — his studies alleging that homosexuals were intentionally spreading AIDS have been frequently cited by anti-gay groups and commentators like Pat Buchanan.

In the late ’90s, Education Secretary William Bennett was badly embarrassed after going on national television and citing Cameron’s unscientific study finding that gay men live only 43 years on average. (Cameron had based the finding on a sample of obituaries in gay newspapers.) Since then, anti-gay groups have continued to make frequent use of Cameron’s findings — almost always without mentioning the source.

Incredibly, serving on Cameron’s board are former U.S. Rep. Robert Dornan (R-Calif.) and former U.S. Sen. Robert Smith (R-Calif.)

Focus on the Family
COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo.
www.family.org

No one has spread the anti-gay gospel as widely, or with as much political impact, as James Dobson, the former child development professor and spanking enthusiast who founded Focus on the Family (FOF) in 1977.

On Focus’ 47-acre campus in Colorado Springs, some 1,300 employees battle against gay rights, sex education and women’s rights with an enormous annual budget of $130 million. Dobson’s radio show, dispensing homespun parenting advice along with jabs at “the militant homosexual agenda,” is heard daily on more than 9,000 radio stations worldwide, giving him an estimated listening audience of more than 200 million.

Focus’ president from 2003 to early 2005, Don Hodel, formerly served as U.S. Secretary of the Interior and head of the Christian Coalition, and now chairs the Council for National Policy, a secretive group of America’s most powerful right-wing leaders that Dobson formerly chaired.

As early as 1989, Dobson came under attack from a fellow conservative evangelical, U.S. Surgeon General C. Everett Koop, who accused him of “reprehensible” and “homophobic” use of false information about how AIDS is transmitted. But Focus began to really flex its anti-gay political muscles in 1992, when Dobson used his radio show to turn Colorado’s anti-gay Amendment 2 (see Holy War) into a fundamentalist cause célèbre.

Among the scores of anti-gay commentaries, stories and products on FOF’s Web site is a Dobson essay that strikes a typical note: “Moms and Dads, are you listening? This movement is the greatest threat to your children. It is of particular danger to your wide-eyed boys, who have no idea what demoralization is planned for them.” Another article claims that “the homosexual agenda is a beast. It wants our kids.”

According to a 1997 book by former FOF staffer Gil Alexander-Moegerle, Dobson once said, “Communities do not let prostitutes, pedophiles, voyeurs, adulterers and those who sexually prefer animals to publicly celebrate their lifestyle, so why should homosexuals get such privileges?” He has also recommended parents withdraw from Parent-Teacher Associations because they allegedly have a liberal social agenda.

But none of this cut into Dobson’s effectiveness as he successfully spearheaded the national campaign against gay marriage in 2003 and 2004 (see Holy War).

Summit Ministries
MANITOU SPRINGS, Colo.
www.summit.org

David Noebel, once an evangelist with the late Billy Joe Hargis’ scandal-plagued Anti-Communist Christian Crusade, founded Summit Ministries in 1962, holding camp-style conferences for Christian college students.

Now an unaccredited college of its own, boasting additional campuses in Ohio and Tennessee and the hearty endorsement of Focus on the Family’s James Dobson, Summit graduates more than 1,300 students a year — all of them steeped in both Christian “dominionism” (generally, the idea that Christianity should dominate society and politics) and anti-gay politics.

In 1977, while still a member of the conspiracy-minded John Birch Society, Noebel was one of the first to recognize that anti-gay activism could surpass anti-communism as a winning issue for fundamentalists. The U.S. was “rotting within,” Noebel warned, and “homosexuality is only an issue when a nation is rotting morally.” Noebel wrote a book called The Homosexual Revolution and gave anti-gay lectures peppered with slurs like “fruits” and “fairies.”

In 1986, he teamed up with Paul Cameron (see Family Research Institute) and then-Summit instructor Wayne Lutton, currently a leader in the white-supremacist Council of Conservative Citizens, to write Special Report: AIDS, which became one of the most controversial anti-gay tracts ever published.

Pat Buchanan’s blurb on the back cover sums up the spirit of this Special Report: “In a healthy society,” Buchanan writes, homosexuality is “contained, segregated, controlled and stigmatized.”

Bolstered by Cameron’s studies alleging that gay people were intentionally spreading the AIDS virus, Special Report proposes a number of means to “suppress” the outbreak, concluding that it might become necessary to “exile” all “active homosexuals” from America.

Summit continues to preach anti-gay propaganda to the next generation of fundamentalist activists, with Mike Haley, an “ex-gay” campaigner who is Focus on the Family’s “youth and gender specialist” and author of a book called Straight Answers: Exposing the Myths and Facts about Homosexuality, currently on the faculty.

Traditional Values Coalition
ANAHEIM, Calif.
www.traditionalvalues.org

Nobody has warned Americans about the “gay threat” longer, or louder, than former Presbyterian minister and Pat Robertson protégé Lou Sheldon, already a veteran anti-gay crusader when he founded the Traditional Values Coalition (TVC) in 1981.

Sheldon, who deems homosexuality a “deathstyle,” sends a steady stream of sensationalistic fundraising appeals to TVC members (he claims 43,000 churches are part of his coalition). Most center around the idea that child-molesting is the real “homosexual agenda.”

“They want our preschool children. … They want our kindergarten children. … They want our middle school and high school children,” read a recent direct-mail appeal.

In 1992, Sheldon reportedly told columnist Jimmy Breslin, “Homosexuals are dangerous. They proselytize. They come to the door, and if your son answers and nobody is there to stop it, they grab the son and run off with him. They steal him. They take him away and turn him into a homosexual.”

TVC reports echo that theory: “As homosexuals continue to make inroads to the public schools, more children will be molested and indoctrinated into the world of homosexuality.” Gay-Straight Alliances on high school campuses are also part of a plot to “target children for recruitment” to gay sex, cross-dressing and sex-change operations, TVC says.

Yet another TVC report claims “the deviant homosexual subculture has fueled efforts to normalize adult/child sex.”

In 1985, Sheldon personally suggested putting AIDS victims into “cities of refuge.” When a hate crimes bill was signed in the early 1990s in California, Sheldon told a reporter that it would “protect sex with animals and the rape of children as forms of political expression.”

Sheldon and his daughter, Andrea Lafferty, are active lobbyists in Washington. In 1995, Sheldon managed to engineer a congressional hearing on gay activists’ supposed infiltration of public schools in a bid to whip up support for Sen. Jesse Helms’ bill to cut federal funds for schools “encouraging or supporting homosexuality.”

But the hearing turned into a fiasco; the star witness was Claire Connolly, a lesbian who falsely accused gay male activists of using federal AIDS funds to hold orgies.

Still, Sheldon’s hard edge has never faded. Commenting on “Queer Eye for the Straight Guy,” Sheldon suggested the Bravo television network “consider airing a series called AIDS Hospice … [that would] far more accurately portray the end results of homosexual sodomy.”

Intelligence Report, Spring 2005, Issue 117

Watch the Full Program Online
Windows Media & Real Player

*Queer Visions Supplement: The Third Reich considered homosexuals common criminals; many were arrested and sent to concentration camps. Once there, they were forced to wear a pink triangle as a brand of their supposedly ‘special’ perversion. Given the fear many gay people lived under back then, it is little wonder how little of their experiences in the death camps is known. However, it is thought that their death rate was higher than any other group.

The following is excerpted from Daily Kos: Gays in the Holocaust: Examining the persecution of gays in the Holocaust is not “rewriting history”. It is discovering it. And those who attempt to revise or ignore this history may want to do some soul searching and be brutally honest with themselves why the fact that the Nazis – the undisputed “evil doers” of all time – oppressed gays using the same rationale that is being used today to deny basic civil rights and the opportunity to marry to homosexuals.

What were these justifications for the imprisonment, forced castration and murder of gays in Nazi Germany? It seems to have been a combination of fear of homosexuality – specifically among men – as being a cancer to the nation, that left unfettered would expand and eventually decay the body politic from within, literally like a cancer. This fear of homosexuality was combined by the Nazi desire to increase Aryan birthrate, and they viewed gay men as specifically standing in the way of this goal.

The following is excerpted from the Houston Voice about a traveling memorial to the homosexual holocaust victims: They were only numerals, three of them, but the very mention of 175 could instill fear in the hearts of gays living in Nazi Germany.

Paragraph 175 of the German Criminal Code was all the authorities needed to detain homosexuals, throw them in prison, send them to concentration camps, conduct medical experiments on them and even kill them.

[Auschwitz mug shot of homosexual August Pfeiffer, a servant. who was born August 8, 1895, in Weferlingen, Germany.
He arrived at Auschwitz on November 1, 1941, and died there December 28, 1941.]

“When the Nazis came to power, they closed the gay bars,” he (survivor Harry Pauly) recalled. “Some homosexuals, especially those who were Jewish, were killed by Nazi hooligans; my friend ‘Susi,’ a drag queen, was stabbed to death.”

Schermann, a 24-year-old Jewish shop girl living in Frankfurt, was arrested in 1940 and deported to the Ravensbrueck concentration camp for women.

Written on the back of her prisoner identification are these words: “Jenny (sic) Sara Schermann, born February 19, 1912, Frankfurt am Main. Unmarried shopgirl in Frankfurt am Main. Licentious lesbian, only visited such [lesbian] bars. Avoided the name ‘Sara.’ Stateless Jew.”

She was gassed at Bernberg in 1942.

When the concentration camps were liberated at the end of World War II, Keel (museum director) said, there was no liberation for homosexuals. Paragraph 175 remained in force.

“At the liberation in 1945, the homosexuals remained in prison to serve out their terms,” Keel said. “They weren’t given any reparations for what they had been through.”

It wasn’t until 1995, 40 years after the war’s end, that homosexuals murdered by the Nazis were recognized.

“On the 40th anniversary, a monument was set up in Germany for homosexual victims of the Holocaust,” Keel said. “In 2002, the German parliament pardoned all homosexuals.”

With a hint of sarcasm in his voice, Keel added, “It only took 60 years.”

“Homosexuals have long been targets of systematic hatred and discrimination. These images and the stories they tell document a horrible time in the history of mankind and remind us that prejudice still exists in both subtle and overt ways even today,” said Coy Tow, executive director of the Greater Houston GLBT Chamber of Commerce.

Also see: A Teacher’s Guide to the Holocaust-Homosexuals; Homosexuals, Genocide of in the Holocaust; Homosexuals, Victims of the Nazi Era; The Pink Triangle: The Nazi War Against Homosexuals; Men With the Pink Triangle: The True, Life-And-Death Story of Homosexuals in the Nazi Death Camps.

As the film’s history shows, it was a project that was supervised by the British Ministry of Information and the American Office of War Information. And during that summer of 1945 some of the documentary editing was done under the direction of Alfred Hitchcock.

“At the time we found the film, it was not entirely clear what role Hitchcock played in its development,” says David Fanning, executive producer of FRONTLINE. “Moreover, one reel of the original six, shot by the Russians, was missing. There was a typed script intact — undated and unsigned — but it had never been recorded.”

FRONTLINE took the film, added the script and asked the late British actor, Trevor Howard, to record it. The aim was to present the film unedited, as close as possible to what the producers intended in 1945.

“Memory of the Camps” includes scenes from Dachau, Buchenwald, Belsen and other Nazi concentration camps whose names are not as well known. Some of the horrors documented took place literally moments before the Allied troops arrived, as the Germans hurried to cover the evidence of what they had done.

Twenty years after its first broadcast on FRONTLINE, “Memory of the Camps” remains one of the most definitive and unforgettable records of the 20th century’s darkest hour.

TRANSCRIPT
Original Airdate: May 5,1985

TREVOR HOWARD

In March 1933, 17,264,296 Germans voted for the National Socialist Party; 20,680,000 others cast their vote for Democrats, Communists, Christian Socialists, People’s Party, etc., etc. Lack of unity among these parties opposing the Nazis proved fatal. The National Socialist Party was in power.

They made many claims and many promises.

The German people had embarked on that long, incredible journey that led seemingly out of chaos to unprecedented triumph. Promise after promise had been fulfilled. Austria 1938, Czechoslovakia 1938, Poland 1939, Norway, Denmark, and France in quick succession. A place in the sun at last. True, they had lost their trade unions and a lot of books had been burned, but it seemed a good sort of bargain, and one got to like being told what to do, having one’s views prescribed, especially if it meant a vista bright with the promise of grandeur and conquest.

In the spring of 1945, the Allies, advancing into the heart of Germany, came to Bergen Belsen. Neat and tidy orchards, well stocked farms line the wayside and the British soldier did not fail to admire the place and its inhabitants– at least until he began to feel a smell It came from a concentration camp, a waste ringed with barbed wire and overlooked by watchtowers. Coming in from the flowering countryside in spite of the frightful smell, things didn’t seem so bad at first; children smiled through the barbed wire and women laughed and waved their hands.

But Belsen camp was vast and inside was a different story. They had not eaten for six days and every soldier’s stock of food was called into use. Water, too, had been cut off and so the water cart was the most important thing to arrive. Most of the people seemed to be listless, beyond hope and astonishment. Hunger had probably affected them that way. We discovered that among this stench of disease and decay was something a bit worse than hunger. Moving vaguely on rickety skeleton legs, they were too ill to eat.

How grateful they were for a kindly word or gesture! What misery, to live amongst such unmentionable filth with scarcely the strength to pick the lice which inevitably swarmed over them. They seemed accustomed to the smell and the horror. They had seen all there was to see.

Huts were almost impossible to go near; they were full of tangled masses of people who had died slowly and painfully of starvation and disease writhing in agony, helpless in puddles of excrement.

It was difficult to imagine the orchards now, those rich fields where the stolid cattle cropped the juicy grass, for here, a few minutes away inside the barbed wire, was nothing but filth and death. Dead prisoners hurled out and stacked in twisted heaps. Dead women like marble statues in the mire. This was what these inmates had to live among– and die among.

The dead which lay there were not numbered in hundreds, but in thousands; not one or two thousand but 30,000.

Here is a pit where the inmates– in order to earn food– had to drag the bodies of their comrades, but they were too weak to keep up with the rate at which they were dying so the pit remains only half filled.

The S.S. Guards in charge of the camp were captured and lined up for examination. Their papers were gone through to confirm their status, their authority.

Each with his death’s head badge.

Each justified by German law.

They were unashamed, well-fed, well-dressed and cheerful.

There were women also on guard in Belsen. Volunteers who came of their own free will, to do their bit.

Not sickly pale with hollow faces and hungry eyes, but well-fed and well-kept with a strutting arrogance.

The commandant of the camp, Joseph Kramer, was removed for trial as a war criminal by an Allied Military Court.

There was an urgent need to get rid of as many bodies as possible, as quickly as possible, so all the S.S. were set to work.

Five hundred Hungarian troops, captured with the S.S., were started on a grave-digging operation. The S.S. themselves were made to do the unpleasant job they had forced the inmates to do.

This, after all, was nothing to these men, they, the “Master Race,” had been taught to be hard; they could kill in cold blood; and it seemed to the British soldier fit and proper that the killers should bury the nameless hopeless creatures they had starved to death.

The faces of the bystanders showed just a little of the hate that Germany has inspired– and some of the anguish, too.

Meanwhile, back at the camp, those who were still living were being attended to. Supplies of hot soup were prepared and those who could eat unaided were fed as quickly as possible.

There had been no water supply for six days, the Germans pleaded it had been cut. We laid on water in a few hours and before twelve hours had passed, had sufficient to enable them to wash.

Soap was provided, the first they had seen for months, and an orgy of washing ensued.

A mobile bath unit was set up and provided hot water for baths.

Inmates thought there was a snag at first– expected to be beaten for going near it probably, but when they learned that the dream was true! Hot water!

And these are the people the Nazis said delighted in being dirty.

But the job of clearing up Belsen was a big one.

The Burgermeisters and Civil Officials of the neighborhood were brought to witness the scenes that had been caused as part of the Nazi scheme of things. This is what they expected.

It had been happening for years, but they shrugged their shoulders and beat their brows and tried to say it had been none of their business; but they were mostly silent.

The S.S. men are not so spick and span now. Seven days of being shouted and cursed at and handling corpses by the hundred are beginning to tell.

After seven dreadful days, the funerals still go on. There seems to be no end.

PRISONER (translated)

My name is Doctor Fritz Klein. I’ve been in this camp for one-and-a-half years. I was born November 24, 1888; I’m 58 years old, a German from Rumania. I’m speaking today, the 24th of April 1945.

TREVOR HOWARD

They were given an address by a British officer through a loud speaker van.

BRITISH OFFICER (Translated)

You, who represent the fathers and brothers of German youth, see before your eyes, some of the sons and daughters who bear the direct responsibility for this crime. They are a small portion only. Therefore, it is more than the human soul is able to bear. But who bears the real responsibility? You, who allowed your leader to carry out this horrible madness; you, who couldn’t do enough for this degenerate triumph. You, who were a part of this camp….

TREVOR HOWARD

One might ask why all the inmates surviving were not removed out of the camp altogether to a large town, for example, where there would be feeding and housing facilities; the answer is simply the dread word– typhus.

A mobile bacteriological unit and all medical aid possible together with 90 medical students from London hospitals were rushed to the spot to deal with it.

Lack of soap and water brought lice to the inmates and lice carry typhus.

To get rid of typhus, one must first get rid of lice, so contaminated patients were removed from their huts and put through a “laundry” process. D.D.T. was dusted over them and they were washed clean, wrapped in blankets, and removed in clean ambulances by teams working in relays in a miracle of relief work.

Two miles away from the camp was found a large S.S. Panzer training school and hospital well stocked with medical supplies– strange that these should not have been used by the Germans for the inmates.

Scores still died every day: they were too far gone many of them to digest any food and there was a desperate shortage of nursing staff. Still, one could be thankful that they were not simply being left to rot away with neglect.

There were children, too, in Belsen camp, though what crime they had committed was difficult to imagine. Most of them had been saved by the women inmates who gave up what little food they could get to the children.

Meals for these children had always been few and far between, so they ate what food we gave them with infinite care– nothing could be more dreadful now than to lose a piece of potato or a drop of soup.

Clothes was another urgent problem, so an outfitting department was set up, and clothes gathered from shops in the surrounding towns, were soon being tried on and gossiped over as women love to do.

There was something symbolic about new clothes. New clothes meant renewed hope.

They donned them with pride.

Now, he can look forward to growing up to useful manhood.

There were more than 200 children under twelve years old found still alive in Belsen camp.

To these children, clean dry clothes and kind words from a stranger were strange, undreamed of, mysterious things.

Some had been born behind the barbed wire. In what circumstances, one dare not try to imagine.

Where are their parents?

Here perhaps?

Or here?

Or down here in this pit?

BRITISH SOLDIER

Today is the 24th of April 1945. My name is Ken Illingworth and I live at Cheshire. I am present in Belsen camp doing guard duty over the S.S. men. The things in this camp are beyond describing. When you actually see them for yourself, you know what you’re fighting for here. A picture in the paper can’t describe it at all. We actually know now, what has been going on in these camps and I know, personally, what I’m fighting for.

REVEREND STRETCH

I’m the Reverend T.J. Stretch, attached as padre to the formation concerning this camp. My home is at Fishguard. My parish is at Holy Trinity Church Aberystwyth. I’ve been here eight days and never in my life, have I seen such damnable ghastliness. This morning we buried over 5,000 bodies. We don’t know who they are. Behind me you can see a pit which will contain another 5,000. There are two others like it in preparation. All these deaths have been caused by systematic starvation and typhus and disease, which have been spread because of the treatment meted out to these poor people by their S.S. guards and their S.S. chief.

TREVOR HOWARD

We shall never know who they were or from what homes they were torn. Whether they were Catholics, Lutherans, or Jews, we only know they were born, they suffered and died in agony in Belsen camp.

And so they lie, Jews, Lutherans, and Catholics– indistinguishable cheek-to-cheek in a common grave.

The living have been taken to a cleaner place.

The typhus infected huts are set afire.

Soon the fire will die, the smoke and ashes will drift away and grass will cover the place.

The barbed wire goes down.

The striped livery goes with it.

Do not imagine this was the only black spot that was uncovered in Germany. There were over 300 others.

No German can say he did not know about them. The whole world had heard of Dachau, for it was publicized by the Nazis as a model camp ever since its inception way back in 1933. On the 28th of February of that year, the Presidential Emergency Decree suspended the basic civil rights of the German people for an indeterminate period and so eliminated legal safeguards against arbitrary imprisonment.

Here were 32,000 men of every European nationality, including 5,660 Germans.

From the outside one might, at a casual glance, have seen nothing remarkable or horrifying, but Dachau was crammed with three or four times the number it was designed for.

Here, as at Belsen, men knew hunger, men became weak, men fell sick, until they died where they lay on the floor.

In the Hut 30, alone, there is recorded, for example, 72 deaths with 24 hours.

Every day the dead were taken from the huts.

Here, as at Belsen, there were many who were too weak to be saved, too sick to eat. Typhus was taking its toll and truck loads of wretchedness had to be somehow dealt with in the already overflowing hospitals.

Dachau had its own brothel for the use of guards and favored prisoners. As the women died, they were replaced by a fresh contingent from the women’s camp at Ravensbrueck.

This was not used as a bath house, but as a death chamber.

Batches of prisoners were marched in here to die.

When the chamber was full, the doors were shut and sealed, a man at the controls let in the poison gas and another batch of helpless victims screamed their lives out beyond the grill.

The gas chamber was conveniently placed next to the mortuary, and next to that was the crematorium.

These great ovens were constructed exclusively for the burning of large numbers of corpses.

In the last three months, official records show that 10,615 people were disposed of here. Their clothes were turned over to the Deutsche Textil und Bekleidungswerke G.M.B.H., a private corporation whose stockholders were S.S. officials, which reclaimed and repaired the garments– with the use of unpaid prison labor– and the re-sold them to the camp clothing depot for the use of new prisoners.

The prisoners arrived often in railway trucks. But, there had been no hurry to unload this one. They went away, leaving the prisoners to die of hunger and cold, and typhus.

We found them like this, frozen stiff in the snow alongside a public road. By some miracle, seventeen men were still alive. All the rest, about 3,000, were dead.

Germans knew about Dachau, but did not care.

In Buchenwald, there were about 80,000 of whom 34,000 were employed outside the camp in an armaments factory.

During the first week of April, 25,000 were removed by the Germans to other camps because of th approach of the Allied forces. When the camp was liberated on April 13th, 20,000 inmates remained.

African Negroes, Albanians, Austrians, Belgians, Brazilians, Canadians, Chinese, Croats, Czechs, Danes, French, Germans, British, Greeks, Dutch, Italians, Yugoslavs, Latvians, Letts, Norwegians, Mexicans, Poles, Rumanians, Spaniards, Swiss, Americans, and Russians.

Fifty-five thousand of them died because of this place. People were tattooed across the belly with slave numbers and forced to work on starvation diet. People were coldly and systematically tortured.

Here Schoker, the camp commandant said, “I want at least 600 Jewish deaths reported in the camp office every day.”

Thugs were appointed as overseers or block leaders.

There was no efficient distribution of food. One prisoner collected the rations for ten or fifteen men. Hunger and hopelessness turned some of them into beasts. Sometimes, a prisoner carrying rations back to the hut was waylaid and robbed by other prisoners. Sometimes, he ate the best part of the food himself. Sometimes, he sold it.

Corruption was fostered for it gave another excuse for killing.

All this seemed so remote from humanity, so far beyond the behavior of man. British Members of Parliament came, and saw, and were sick at heart.

It had to be seen to be believed.

German citizens were brought from Weimar. They had to see, too, to see what they had been fighting for, and we had been fighting against.

They came cheerfully, like sightseers to a chamber of horrors, for there indeed were some real horrors. If a prisoner had a curiously tattooed skin, it was taken from him. We can only hope he was dead when it was done. The skin was tanned and made into lampshades, etc.

These shrunken heads belonged to two Polish prisoners who had escaped and been recaptured.

Some of the visitors did not care for the sight and were assisted by ex-prisoners.

Ebensee is a holiday resort in the mountains. The air is clean and pure. It cures sickness and there is a sweetness about this place: a gentle peace.

In this place the Luftwaffe or S.S. Panzer officer on leave relaxes, eats well, breathes deeply, finds romance. Everything is charming and picturesque.

But the concentration camp had become an integral part of the German economic system, so it was here, too.

They were able to see the mountains, but what use are mountains without food.

Prisoners at Dachau and Buchenwald dreaded being sent here. To them, this place did not mean recuperation, only starvation, tuberculosis through slavery in an underground factory, and finally left to cough one’s life out unaided and crowded in the filth and stench of a hut, unfit for dogs, but for some reason called a hospital.

The daily collection of corpses was disposed of through the chimney.

Mauthausen. First used in 1938, this camp was the center of a group of subsidiary camps.

Forty thousand people had died here since the beginning of the year.

Here the gas chamber held 200 at a time and the crematorium dealt with 300 per day– every day.

Ludwigslust. In the north of Germany, it was the same story. The few who remained alive were staggering on the verge of death.

They were the survivors and these were the rest– hurriedly murdered lest they be set free to live a normal life.

The authorities in the camps took special measures to make sure that a man would neither live normally nor die normally, neither should he sleep normally.

He was surrounded by barbed wire and he had to sleep on barbed wire.

Ohrdruf. Here was carnage and desolation. Prisoners had been dragged from the sacks of straw in the hovels called hospitals, shot and hastily disposed of by the first means to hand. There must have been some feeling of guilt or presumably there would not have been an attempt to destroy the evidence.

In the outskirts of Leipig, an effort was made to prevent 300 forced workers in a factory from being set free by advancing Allied troops. Three hundred were locked in a mess hut and burned. This is where it stood. Some of the desperate, screaming prisoners broke out. Flame throwers and machine guns were waiting to receive them.

This was a woman.

Some almost reached the barbed wire, some got there and stayed there, for it was electrified.

This was a Polish engineer.

Gardelegen. American troops advancing did not know that in this barn the Germans had locked 1,800 prisoners and set burning straw alight to suffocate them. In the morning before retreating they had poured petrol on the bodies in an attempt to burned what remained. It still smoldered when the American troops arrived.

This man was shot because he gasped for air, trying to escape while the rest of him burned in the barn.

Auschwitz. The most up to date institution was better equipped for killing. Transports of prisoners from all over occupied Europe were went for extermination in one of the special Vernichtungslager. Here, 4 million people were murdered. As many men, women, and children as you could pack into a great city.

(SUBTITLES)

The final reel of this film was shot by Russian cameraman at Auschwitz concentration camp. The film has been lost. But the script survives. This is how it concludes.

TREVOR HOWARD

The dead have been buried.

It remains for us to care for these, the living. It remains for us to hope tht Germans may help mend what they have broken, and cleanse what they have befouled.

Thousands of German people were made to see for themselves, to bury the dead, to file past the victims. This was the end of the journey they had so confidently begun in 1933. Twelve years? No, in terms of barbarity and brutality they had traveled backwards for 12,000 years.

Unless the world learns the lesson these pictures teach, night will fall. But, by God’s grace, we who live will learn.

(excerpted from the PBS Frontline website.)